Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2521 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - 177 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
177
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £74.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |