Key Differences
In short — Vibox X-65 outperforms the cheaper Vibox X-8 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Vibox X-8 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Vibox X-8 Gaming PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Vibox X-65 - £1976.95 vs £3359.95
- Up to 25% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox X-65 - £11.3 vs £15.13 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox X-65 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox X-8 - 222 vs 175 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
175
78.82882882882883%
Value, £/FPS
£11.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1976.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,976.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4005 minutes ago
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
£15.13/FPS
74.68605419695969%
Price, £
£3359.95
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for £3,359.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4006 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
47.08004509582864%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
48.55813953488372%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Vibox X-8 Gaming PC | vs | Vibox X-65 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Core i9-13900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
