Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Vibox X-65 outperforms the cheaper Vibox VIII-26 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Vibox X-65 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 222% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox VIII-26 - 222 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox VIII-26 - £15.13 vs £16.64 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox VIII-26 Gaming PC
- Up to 66% cheaper than Vibox X-65 - £1147.95 vs £3359.95
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £3,359.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6277 minutes ago
FPS
69
31.08108108108108%
Value, £/FPS
£16.64/FPS
90.92548076923077%
Price, £
£1147.95
100%
Buy for £1,147.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19.233370913190527%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
15.426356589147286%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Vibox X-65 Gaming PC | vs | Vibox VIII-26 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Core i9-10900F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
