Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Vibox X-65 outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Vibox X-65 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 594% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming - 222 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 42% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming - £16.31 vs £28.09 per FPS
Advantages of ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC
- Up to 75% cheaper than Vibox X-65 - £899.00 vs £3619.95
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Vibox X-65 Gaming PC - Intel i9 14900KF Processor - Nvidia RTX 4090 24GB Graphics Card - 32GB RAM - 2TB NVMe M.2 SSD - 1000W PSU - Windows 11 - WiFi
Buy for £3,619.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11313 minutes ago
ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC] AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (up to 4.9 GHz) RGB Mini PC, 32GB DDR5 (Dual Channel) 512GB NVMe SSD Mini computers with AMD Radeon 680M(12cores/2200 MHz)【WiFi6/BT5.2/USB4(DP1.4)/8K@60Hz】
Buy for £899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 672 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
16%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
8%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Vibox X-65 Gaming PC | vs | ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | Radeon 680M |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
