Key Differences
In short — Vibox X-210 outperforms the cheaper Vibox III-173 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Vibox III-173 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Vibox X-210 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 119% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-173 - 175 vs 80 FPS
Advantages of Vibox III-173 Gaming PC
- Up to 56% cheaper than Vibox X-210 - £922.95 vs £2079.95
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox X-210 - £11.54 vs £11.89 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
175
100%
Value, £/FPS
£11.89/FPS
97.05634987384354%
Price, £
£2079.95
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,079.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50166 minutes ago
FPS
80
45.714285714285715%
Value, £/FPS
£11.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£922.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £922.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
56.56130268199233%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
37.70753512132822%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Vibox X-210 Gaming PC | vs | Vibox III-173 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
