Key Differences
In short — Vibox X-209 outperforms the cheaper SCAN Aurum on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing SCAN Aurum is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Vibox X-209 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than SCAN Aurum - 104 vs 78 FPS
Advantages of SCAN Aurum Gaming PC
- Up to 43% cheaper than Vibox X-209 - £1299.96 vs £2279.95
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Vibox X-209 - £16.67 vs £21.92 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £2,279.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 480467 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
78
75%
Value, £/FPS
£16.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1299.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,299.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
95%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
89%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Vibox X-209 Gaming PC | vs | SCAN Aurum Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |