Key Differences
In short — Vibox VIII-5 outperforms the cheaper Intel NUC 12 NUC12SNKi7 Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Intel NUC 12 NUC12SNKi7 Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Vibox VIII-5 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 17% better in Dead Space than Intel NUC 12 NUC12SNKi7 Mini - 95 vs 81 FPS
Advantages of Intel NUC 12 Enthusiast NUC12SNKi7 Mini PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than Vibox VIII-5 - £859.0 vs £1321.95
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dead Space than Vibox VIII-5 - £10.6 vs £13.92 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£13.92/FPS
76.14942528735632%
Price, £
£1321.95
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,321.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4971 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
81
85.26315789473684%
Value, £/FPS
£10.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£859
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4971 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
51.5625%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
74.12109375%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Arc A770
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
Vibox VIII-5 Gaming PC | vs | Intel NUC 12 Enthusiast NUC12SNKi7 Mini PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-11900F | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Arc A770 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |