Key Differences
In short — Mavsloly Mini outperforms the cheaper Vibox III-171 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Vibox III-171 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Vibox III-171 Gaming PC
- Up to 57% cheaper than Mavsloly Mini - £901.95 vs £2080.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Elden Ring than Mavsloly Mini - £13.07 vs £19.26 per FPS
Advantages of Mavsloly Mini Gaming PC
- Performs up to 57% better in Elden Ring than Vibox III-171 - 108 vs 69 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FPS
69
63.888888888888886%
Value, £/FPS
£13.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£901.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £901.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3032 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
108
100%
Value, £/FPS
£19.26/FPS
67.86085150571132%
Price, £
£2080
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,080 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74.5580808080808%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51.86649099692578%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-13900F
null-core
Single-Core
2730
100%
Multi-Core
17219
100%
CPU Winner
Vibox III-171 Gaming PC | vs | Mavsloly Mini Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10700F | CPU | Core i9-13900F |
GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |