Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Vibox VIII-37 outperforms the more expensive Vibox III-160 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Vibox VIII-37 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-160 - 114 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Vibox III-160 - £1096.95 vs £1157.95
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-160 - £9.62 vs £11.94 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
97
85.08771929824562%
Value, £/FPS
£11.94/FPS
80.56951423785594%
Price, £
£1157.95
94%
Buy for £1,157.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93956 minutes ago
Buy for £1,096.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93957 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
73.49033816425121%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
92.05336426914153%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Vibox III-160 Gaming PC | vs | Vibox VIII-37 Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10700F | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |