Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Velztorm Armix CTO vs Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation PC Comparison

Velztorm Armix CTO vs Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Velztorm Armix CTO outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.

Calculator background
This is a free version of Red Dead Redemption 2.
Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest


FPS

167

100%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

My Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Logo
GeForce RTX 4090

24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit

Pixel Fillrate

443.5 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

1290 GTexel/s

100%

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores

Full CPU Comparison
Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC Image

Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC

vs
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC Image

Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC

UnknownUnknown
Ryzen 9 7900XRyzen 9 7950X3D
GeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB
64 GB
2 TB SSD + 6 TB HDDN/A Storage

Popular Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC and Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC Comparisons

Compare 2 PCs in Games

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.