Key Differences
In short — Sedatech UC07907I8I1HI, outperforms Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value. The better performing Sedatech UC07907I8I1HI, is 987 days older than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4.
Advantages of Sedatech UC07907I8I1HI, PC
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 - 84 vs 74 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mar 1st, 2021
Nov 13th, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 1st, 2021
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
Nov 13th, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 1st, 2021
Core i7-9700KF
3.6 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1666
73%
Multi-Core
7107
66%
Nov 13th, 2023
Core i5-13400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2290
100%
Multi-Core
10745
100%
CPU Winner
Sedatech UC07907I8I1HI, PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2023 |
| Core i7-9700KF | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 500 GB SSD + 3 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
