Key Differences
In short — Vibox X-65 outperforms the cheaper SCAN Aurum on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing SCAN Aurum is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of SCAN Aurum Gaming PC
- Up to 53% cheaper than Vibox X-65 - £1579.98 vs £3359.95
- Up to 12% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Vibox X-65 - £18.16 vs £20.61 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox X-65 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 87% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than SCAN Aurum - 163 vs 87 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
3rd Variation
FPS
87
53.37423312883436%
Value, £/FPS
£18.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1579.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5767 minutes ago
Buy for £3,359.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
44.64487034949267%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
42.97674418604651%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-12900KF
null-core
Single-Core
2542
85.50285906491759%
Multi-Core
14881
74.03114272921745%
SCAN Aurum Gaming PC | vs | Vibox X-65 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i9-13900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
