Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 35% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 175 vs 130 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Memory PC
30th Variation
Megaport PC
53rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
30th Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
91%
Megaport PC
53rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
95%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Megaport PC
53rd Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |