Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 272 vs 252 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Memory PC
285th Variation
Megaport Gaming PC
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
285th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
79%
GPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC
285th Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
100%
Multi-Core
9171
94%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
