Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 52% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Memory - 196 vs 129 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Memory PC
1st Variation
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
44%
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2608
100%
Multi-Core
15118
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
