Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ionz outperforms the cheaper Vibox III-165 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ionz Gaming PC
- Performs up to 31% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-165 - 105 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-165 - £9.14 vs £11.56 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox III-165 Gaming PC
- Up to 4% cheaper than ionz - £924.95 vs £959.95
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
9th Variation
FPS
105
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£959.95
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £959.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Buy for £924.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ionz Gaming PC | vs | Vibox III-165 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
