Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Intel Pc, 12th Core i7-12700H(14C/20T, 24MB Cache) Intel NUC 12 Mini outperforms the cheaper Vibox III-165 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Intel Gaming Pc, 12th Core i7-12700H(14C/20T, 24MB Cache) Intel NUC 12 Enthusiast Mini PC
- Performs up to 52% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Vibox III-165 - 94 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 29% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Vibox III-165 - £10.52 vs £14.92 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox III-165 Gaming PC
- Up to 6% cheaper than Intel Pc, 12th Core i7-12700H(14C/20T, 24MB Cache) Intel NUC 12 Mini - £924.95 vs £989.0
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
94
100%
Value, £/FPS
£10.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£989
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
Buy for £924.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Arc A770
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Intel Gaming Pc, 12th Core i7-12700H(14C/20T, 24MB Cache) Intel NUC 12 Enthusiast Mini PC | vs | Vibox III-165 Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
Arc A770 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |