Key Differences
In short — ginger6 outperforms the cheaper Mavsloly Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Mavsloly Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ginger6 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 65% better in Starfield than Mavsloly Mini - 84 vs 51 FPS
Advantages of Mavsloly Mini Gaming PC
- Up to 46% cheaper than ginger6 - £2080.0 vs £3868.44
- Up to 11% better value when playing Starfield than ginger6 - £40.78 vs £46.05 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £3,868.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 497 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
51
60%
Value, £/FPS
£40.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2080
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £2,080 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
35%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
35%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900KF
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2973
100%
Multi-Core
20101
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Core i9-13900F
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2730
91%
Multi-Core
17219
85%
ginger6 Gaming PC | vs | Mavsloly Mini Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Core i9-13900F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
