Key Differences
In short — ginger6 outperforms the cheaper Intel NUC 12 NUC12SNKi7 Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Intel NUC 12 NUC12SNKi7 Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ginger6 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 147% better in Starfield than Intel NUC 12 NUC12SNKi7 Mini - 84 vs 34 FPS
Advantages of Intel NUC 12 Enthusiast NUC12SNKi7 Mini PC
- Up to 79% cheaper than ginger6 - £799.2 vs £3868.44
- Up to 49% better value when playing Starfield than ginger6 - £23.51 vs £46.05 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £3,868.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 498 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
34
40%
Value, £/FPS
£23.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£799.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £799.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
Arc A770
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
69%
Texel Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
47%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900KF
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2973
100%
Multi-Core
20101
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
77%
Multi-Core
10780
53%
ginger6 Gaming PC | vs | Intel NUC 12 Enthusiast NUC12SNKi7 Mini PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | Arc A770 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |