Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ginger6 outperforms the cheaper Vibox III-173 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ginger6 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 41% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-173 - 113 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-173 - £10.35 vs £11.06 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox III-173 Gaming PC
- Up to 24% cheaper than ginger6 - £884.95 vs £1169.99
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
FPS
113
100%
Value, £/FPS
£10.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1169.99
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 382 minutes ago
Buy for £884.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 384 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i5-14400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2350
100%
Multi-Core
11359
100%
CPU Winner
ginger6 Gaming PC | vs | Vibox III-173 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-14400F | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
