Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Cube - outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 345 vs 318 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EMCA4 Computer PC
25th Variation
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
EMCA4 Computer PC
25th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
69%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
6th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
