Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms Dell XPS 8950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 38% better in Rust than Dell XPS 8950 - 224 vs 162 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
73%
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
88%
Multi-Core
15445
77%
Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
