Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms CLX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 34% better in Starfield than CLX - 51 vs 38 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
GPU Winner
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2988
100%
Multi-Core
19479
100%
CPU Winner
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2773
93%
Multi-Core
15748
81%
CLX Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
4 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |