The Centaurus Polaris 4AW is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the ROG NUC Mini. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
The ROG NUC Mini Gaming PC is better in every way
Advantages of the ROG NUC Mini Gaming PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Centaurus Polaris 4AW vs ROG NUC Mini for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Average FPS
49
37%
Min 1% FPS
22
28%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
ROG NUC Mini Gaming PC
Average FPS
133
100%
Min 1% FPS
80
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Arc A380
6 GB GDDR6 | 96-bit
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
41%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
29%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
14%
ROG NUC Mini Gaming PC
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2206
98%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11922
99%
ROG NUC Mini Gaming PC
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2251
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
12037
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | ROG NUC Mini Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | – |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Arc A380 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB | SSD | 1 TB |
| – | HDD | – |
