The Centaurus Polaris 4AW is a much slower gaming PC Build than the MXZ. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
The MXZ Gaming PC is better in every way
Advantages of the MXZ Gaming PC
- A much faster PC Build for gaming
Centaurus Polaris 4AW vs MXZ for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Average FPS
49
72%
Min 1% FPS
22
61%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
MXZ Gaming PC
8th Variation
Average FPS
68
100%
Min 1% FPS
36
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Arc A380
6 GB GDDR6 | 96-bit
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
77%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
66%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
33%
MXZ Gaming PC
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.74 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2206
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11922
100%
MXZ Gaming PC
8th Variation
Core i5-10600KF
4.1 GHz | 6-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1697
77%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
6801
57%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | MXZ Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | – |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core i5-10600KF |
| Arc A380 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB | SSD | – |
| – | HDD | – |
