The Centaurus Polaris 4AW is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the Megaport. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
The Megaport Gaming PC is better in every way
Advantages of the Megaport Gaming PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Centaurus Polaris 4AW vs Megaport for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Average FPS
49
20%
Min 1% FPS
22
13%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Megaport Gaming PC
59th Variation
Average FPS
243
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Arc A380
6 GB GDDR6 | 96-bit
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
4%
Megaport Gaming PC
59th Variation
GeForce RTX 5090
32 GB GDDR7 | 512-bit
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2206
71%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11922
58%
Megaport Gaming PC
59th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
3091
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
20685
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | – |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| Arc A380 | GPU | GeForce RTX 5090 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB | SSD | – |
| – | HDD | – |
