The Centaurus Monolith 2 is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the EMCA4. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC
The EMCA4 Computer PC is better in every way
Advantages of the EMCA4 Computer PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Centaurus Monolith 2 vs EMCA4 for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC
Average FPS
59
33%
Min 1% FPS
28
25%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC
Arc A380
6 GB GDDR6 | 96-bit
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
8%
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
51.48 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2642
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
15520
100%
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2402
91%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11831
76%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
General | ||
- | Release Date | - |
Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
Arc A380 | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB | SSD | - |
- | HDD | - |