The Captiva is a much slower gaming PC Build than the ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- A much faster gaming PC Build than the Captiva
Captiva PC vs ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC for Gaming
With selected game settings
Captiva PC
4th Variation
Average FPS
141
72%
Min 1% FPS
85
68%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
Average FPS
196
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
FPS
My Games
The FPS you'll get in the saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
55%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
56%
ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
52.22 TFLOPS
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2608
87%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
15118
78%
ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2988
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
19479
100%
CPU Winner
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Captiva PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
