The Captiva is a much slower gaming PC Build than the Megaport. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Captiva PC
The Megaport Gaming PC is better in every way
Advantages of the Megaport Gaming PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Captiva PC vs Megaport Gaming PC for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Captiva PC
3rd Variation
Average FPS
107
66%
Min 1% FPS
62
61%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Megaport Gaming PC
45th Variation
Average FPS
163
100%
Min 1% FPS
101
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Captiva PC
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61%
Texture Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
22.06 TFLOPS
62%
Megaport Gaming PC
45th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.48 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2145
73%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
9696
49%
Megaport Gaming PC
45th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
4.2 GHz | 16-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2930
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
19675
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Captiva PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
