Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — AtomMan G7 PT MINI outperforms the cheaper Vibox III-165 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of AtomMan G7 PT MINI PC
- Performs up to 32% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-165 - 106 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox III-165 - £10.38 vs £11.46 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox III-165 Gaming PC
- Up to 17% cheaper than AtomMan G7 PT MINI - £916.95 vs £1099.99
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2405 minutes ago
FPS
80
75.47169811320755%
Value, £/FPS
£11.46/FPS
90.57591623036649%
Price, £
£916.95
100%
Buy for £916.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon RX 7600
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
69.51147733961153%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
69.51147733961153%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
AtomMan G7 PT MINI PC | vs | Vibox III-165 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7945HX | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| Radeon RX 7600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
