Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - 225 vs 222 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
222
99%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
