Key Differences
In short — Dell XPS 8960 outperforms ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core 3D Modelling SolidWorks CAD Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Dell XPS 8960 Desktop PC
- Performs up to 100% better in Dead Space than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core 3D Modelling SolidWorks CAD Workstation - 74 vs 37 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
37
50%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon Pro WX 5100
8 GB GDDR5 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
29%
Texel Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
51%
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core 3D Modelling SolidWorks CAD Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Dell XPS 8960 Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5950X | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| Radeon Pro WX 5100 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 4 TB HDD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
