Key Differences
In short — Vibox X-201 outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC
- Up to 73% cheaper than Vibox X-201 - £899.0 vs £3299.95
- Up to 10% better value when playing F1 23 than Vibox X-201 - £8.99 vs £9.97 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox X-201 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 231% better in F1 23 than ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming - 331 vs 100 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC] AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (up to 4.9 GHz) RGB Mini PC, 32GB DDR5 (Dual Channel) 512GB NVMe SSD Mini computers with AMD Radeon 680M(12cores/2200 MHz)【WiFi6/BT5.2/USB4(DP1.4)/8K@60Hz】
Buy for £899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Vibox X-201 Gaming PC - Intel i9 14900KF Processor - Nvidia RTX 4090 24GB Graphics Card - 32GB RAM - 2TB NVMe M.2 SSD - 1000W PSU - Windows 11 - WiFi
Buy for £3,299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
15%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
8%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC | vs | Vibox X-201 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 6900HX | CPU | Core i9-13900KF |
| Radeon 680M | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
