Key Differences
In short — Vibox II-117 outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC
- Up to 61% cheaper than Vibox II-117 - £399.0 vs £1012.64
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox II-117 - £12.47 vs £13.32 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox II-117 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 138% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming - 76 vs 32 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
32
42.10526315789473%
Value, £/FPS
£12.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1055 minutes ago
FPS
76
100%
Value, £/FPS
£13.32/FPS
93.61861861861863%
Price, £
£1012.64
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,012.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
59.610499576629984%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
44.70787468247248%
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC | vs | Vibox II-117 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 6900HX | CPU | Core i5-10400F |
| Radeon 680M | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
