Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — 3XS iCUE outperforms the cheaper Vibox VIII-52 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of 3XS iCUE Gaming PC
- Performs up to 178% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Vibox VIII-52 - 214 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Vibox VIII-52 - £15.42 vs £16.3 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox VIII-52 Gaming PC
- Up to 62% cheaper than 3XS iCUE - £1254.95 vs £3300.0
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
214
100%
Value, £/FPS
£15.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£3300
38%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £3,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 654 minutes ago
Buy for £1,254.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
8 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
38%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
26%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
3XS iCUE Gaming PC | vs | Vibox VIII-52 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
