Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Razer Blade 15 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1835 days newer than Razer Blade 15.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 92% better in Battlefield V than Razer Blade 15 - 167 vs 87 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Apr 23rd, 2019 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Apr 23rd, 2019 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
75.84 GPixel/s
93%
Texel Fillrate
170.6 GTexel/s
70%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Apr 23rd, 2019 • 2nd Variation
Core i7-9750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1351
56%
Multi-Core
4930
43%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade 15 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-9750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 256 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
