Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Razer Blade 15 Base on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1490 days newer than Razer Blade 15 Base.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 106% better in Battlefield V than Razer Blade 15 Base - 167 vs 81 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Apr 2nd, 2020 • 1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Apr 2nd, 2020 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
57.6 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
144 GTexel/s
59%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Apr 2nd, 2020 • 1st Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
60%
Multi-Core
5396
47%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade 15 Base Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |