Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Razer Blade 14 - AMD-Gaming- on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 2848 days newer than Razer Blade 14 - AMD-Gaming-.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Razer Blade 14 - AMD-Gaming- - 107 vs 102 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
May 1st, 2024
FPS
107
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Jul 14th, 2016 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jul 14th, 2016 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
292.3 GTexel/s
100%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
84%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jul 14th, 2016 • 2nd Variation
Ryzen 9 6900HX
3.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1979
82%
Multi-Core
9532
83%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade 14 - AMD-Gaming- Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 14th, 2016 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 9 6900HX | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
