Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms OMEN on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 851 days newer than OMEN.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 87% better in F1 22 than OMEN - 148 vs 79 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
148
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Jan 1st, 2022 • 23rd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 1st, 2022 • 23rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
94%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
63%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 1st, 2022 • 23rd Variation
Ryzen 7 4800H
2.9 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1461
61%
Multi-Core
5935
52%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
OMEN Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 4800H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
