Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms OMEN 17-cb0006ng (17,3 Zoll / FHD IPS 144Hz) on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1772 days newer than OMEN 17-cb0006ng (17,3 Zoll / FHD IPS 144Hz).
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 64% better in Far Cry 5 than OMEN 17-cb0006ng (17,3 Zoll / FHD IPS 144Hz) - 131 vs 80 FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
80
61%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
May 1st, 2024
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
92.16 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
207.4 GTexel/s
85%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
88%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
OMEN 17-cb0006ng (17,3 Zoll / FHD IPS 144Hz) Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-9750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
