Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms MSI Prestige 15 Thin and Performance Driven on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1030 days newer than MSI Prestige 15 Thin and Performance Driven.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 60% better in Forza Horizon 4 than MSI Prestige 15 Thin and Performance Driven - 234 vs 146 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
May 1st, 2024
FPS
234
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Jul 6th, 2021
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jul 6th, 2021
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
40%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jul 6th, 2021
Core i7-1195G7
2.9 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1840
77%
Multi-Core
5308
46%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
MSI Prestige 15 Thin and Performance Driven Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 6th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-1195G7 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
