Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch outperforms the cheaper MEDION Erazer Major X20 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MEDION Erazer Major X20 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION Erazer Major X20 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 57% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch - £1469.98 vs £3399.00
- Up to 30% better value when playing Starfield than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch - £39.73 vs £56.65 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 62% better in Starfield than MEDION Erazer Major X20 - 60 vs 37 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
37
62%
Value, £/FPS
£39.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1469.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,469.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Jan 10th, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
60
100%
Value, £/FPS
£56.65/FPS
70%
Price, £
£3399
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for £3,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 10th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
47%
Jan 10th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 10th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION Erazer Major X20 Gaming Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 10th, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 2560x1440 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
