Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 outperforms the cheaper HP Victus 15.6" on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing HP Victus 15.6" is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Victus 15.6" Gaming Laptop
- Up to 42% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 - £869.99 vs £1499.00
- Up to 37% better value when playing Diablo IV than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 - £10.36 vs £16.47 per FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 8% better in Diablo IV than HP Victus 15.6" - 91 vs 84 FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Sep 15th, 2024
FPS
84
92%
Value, £/FPS
£10.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£869.99
172%
Value Winner
Buy for £869.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352 minutes ago
FPS
91
100%
Value, £/FPS
£16.47/FPS
63%
Price, £
£1499
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Sep 15th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Sep 15th, 2024
Ryzen 7 8845HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2352
100%
Multi-Core
11123
92%
CPU Winner
HP Victus 15.6" Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 15th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 8845HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
