Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP - Victus 16-r0009sl Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 430 days newer than HP - Victus 16-r0009sl Notebook.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than HP - Victus 16-r0009sl Notebook - 167 vs 153 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 26th, 2023
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 26th, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 26th, 2023
Core i5-13500
2.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2403
100%
Multi-Core
12346
100%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
93%
HP - Gaming Victus 16-r0009sl Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 26th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i5-13500 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
