Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE - AORUS 17X (2024) outperforms GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing GIGABYTE - AORUS 17X (2024) is 342 days newer than GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080.
Advantages of GIGABYTE - AORUS 17X (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 - 142 vs 132 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
132
93%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
Jan 16th, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 16th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
75%
GPU Winner
Jan 16th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 16th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2695
98%
Multi-Core
15815
95%
GIGABYTE AORUS 17X: 17.3" Thin Bezel QHD 2560x1440 240Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop | vs | GIGABYTE - AORUS 17X (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 8th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 16th, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 2560x1440 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
