Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Gigabyte AORUS 15 XE4 15.6" QHD 165Hz Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 820 days newer than Gigabyte AORUS 15 XE4 15.6" QHD 165Hz Notebook.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Gigabyte AORUS 15 XE4 15.6" QHD 165Hz Notebook - 85 vs 80 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
May 1st, 2024
FPS
85
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
135.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
259.4 GTexel/s
100%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
94%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Gigabyte AORUS 15 XE4 15.6" QHD 165Hz Gaming Notebook | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |