Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Dell XPS 17 9720 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 769 days newer than Dell XPS 17 9720.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 29% better in Resident Evil 4 than Dell XPS 17 9720 - 101 vs 78 FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
May 1st, 2024
FPS
101
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mar 24th, 2022 • 1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 24th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
70%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 24th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
96%
Multi-Core
10780
94%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Dell XPS 17 9720 Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Mar 24th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |