Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Dell G3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1605 days newer than Dell G3.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 507% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Dell G3 - 85 vs 14 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
85
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Dec 9th, 2019
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Dec 9th, 2019
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
2 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
23.89 GPixel/s
29%
Texel Fillrate
59.72 GTexel/s
24%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Dell G3 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 9th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i5-8300H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB HDD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
