Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Ultra Slim on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 819 days newer than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Ultra Slim.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 48% better in Forza Horizon 4 than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Ultra Slim - 234 vs 158 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
May 1st, 2024
FPS
234
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Feb 2nd, 2022
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 2nd, 2022
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 2nd, 2022
Ryzen 7 5800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1749
73%
Multi-Core
7120
62%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Ultra Slim Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 2nd, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 5800H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
