Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS Vivobook 16X Business on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 73 days newer than ASUS Vivobook 16X Business.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 13% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than ASUS Vivobook 16X Business - 62 vs 55 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
May 1st, 2024
FPS
62
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Feb 18th, 2024 • 1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 18th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 18th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91%
Multi-Core
11484
78%
ASUS Vivobook 16X Business Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 18th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
